Search for: "United States v. W. T. Grant Co." Results 1 - 20 of 657
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  (Granted, the Court acknowledged that the resolution of such issues was a highly fact-specific endeavor. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
” 15 The remaining “lesser” or “non-core” factors included the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the putative employer, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. 16 The 2021 IC Rule further provided that it was “highly unlikely” that these non-core factors could outweigh the combined probative value of the core factors. 17 The Final Rule rescinds… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  In theory, the Court “has an obligation to satisfy itself … of its own jurisdiction," Steel Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
The story of Floyd and his cabinet co-conspirators was the paradigm case that shaped Section 3. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Macquarie’s motion to dismiss, holding that the plaintiffs had failed to plead an actionable misstatement or omission, a violation of Item 303, and scienter. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Grant and others characterized as an attempt to make those arms available to the seceding states.[4] "Floyd's Robberies"[5] and his betrayal of the United States were infamous, but they were not part of any small "First Insurrection. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
§ 2383, which provides that “[w]hoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto … shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Ralston Purina Co.[4] Imagine that — the Commission engaging in notice-and-comment rulemaking, including a re-proposal, to address regulatory uncertainty and ambiguity following judicial decisions. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm by Norman L. Eisen
In the only order granting such a motion, Judge Robert C. [read post]