Search for: "United Coal Co. v. Land Use Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Instructive for the asbestos property damage and similar environmental cases, the Restatement’s following suggestion was of particular interest: “Apportionment is commonly made in cases of private nuisance, where the pollution of a stream, or flooding, or smoke or dust or noise, from different sources, has interfered with the plaintiff’s use or enjoyment of his land. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
These decisions were grounded on compliance with the Fund's product based coal exclusions.The relevant texts follow.__________ Unofficial English Translation To Norges Bank 28 April 2021 Recommendation to place Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd under observation Summary: The Council on Ethics recommends that Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (HDEC) be placed under observation… [read post]
Because it found that the regulation was not a categorical taking, the district court found that it was subject to the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:23 am by Patricia Salkin
In the most famous and first partial regulatory takings case, Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
In 2012, the City entered into an agreement with CBAC Gaming, LLC (CBAC Gaming) to develop a tract of land, approximately 8.58 acres, for use as a casino and ancillary facilities. [read post]