Search for: "United States, et al v. Miles, et al" Results 1 - 20 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 4:55 am by Charles Sartain
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Anyway, the now 32-year-old owner of the then-four-month-old penis depicted in the photo has sued Nirvana et al., alleging that the naked baby photo is child pornography. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Welty
See Ali Awhani-Robar et al., Trend in Loaded Handgun Carrying Among Adult Handgun Owners in the United States, 2015-2019, Am. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
The Regents of the University of California, et al. (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 226. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Many are reported to be seeking asylum.[1] They have active proceedings to determine their status and, pending such determination, are authorized to remain in the United States. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Miles case, the Court held that resale minimum price fixing was illegal per se under Section 1.[11] It found horizontal price-fixing agreements to be per se illegal in Socony Vacuum.[12] Since Socony Vacuum, the Court has limited the application of per se illegality to bid rigging (a form of horizontal price fixing),[13] horizontal market divisions,[14] tying,[15] and group boycotts[16]. [read post]