Search for: "United States Steel Corporation v. Wood"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
Note that I write this post during the public hearings for the January 6th Commission, which is faithfully documenting an attempted coup of the United States government that would not have been possible without a rampant populist fervor that continues to this day. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
The corporate tax rate was lowered from 57 to 30 percent (while the corporate tax base was broadened), and capital income—interest, dividends, and capital gains—were taxed at a uniform rate of 30 percent.[6] In addition, during the last 30 years, Sweden has abolished or reformed several other taxes to encourage economic growth, including the abolition of the inheritance tax in 2004, the entrepreneurial tax in 2005, and the wealth tax in 2007.[7] Note that these changes… [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
In Steel Company v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
” The fasteners attach sheet metal to wood or steel building frames. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
To be sure, he also cites one Pennsylvania case--Barium Steel Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Employers united: an empirical analysis of corporate political speech in the wake of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
This can be a heavy burden, particularly where the charge is a grave one, but requiring defendants to prove truth is not incompatible with Article 10: see McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22; Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The contaminants are primarily solvents and petroleum products related to wood treatment activities at the facility. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Standard Fusee Corporation. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
