Search for: "United States of America et al v. Duke et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION,INC., ET AL. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION,INC., ET AL. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
Bell, et. al., Environmental Law Handbook (2019). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
City of Seattle, et al. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm
Duke, et. al.) challenging the President’s postponement of the International Entrepreneur Rule. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am
Yes, Rosenberg, et al. have a point when they say America was slow to extend the franchise to the African population. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Matsuda, Mari J. et al., Words That Wound (1993). [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Collins, “A Considerable Surgical Operation”: Article III, Equity, and Judge-Made Law in the Federal Courts, Duke Law Journal 60(2):249-343 (2010). [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Page Keeton, et al., Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts §96, at 686 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Here, Muller et al. have created an excellent book with wide-reaching appeal whose focal point and strength are Bill Manbo's photographs. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Cassim (managing editor) ; Maleka Femida Cassim … [et al.] [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
