Search for: "United States v. 38 CASES, ETC."
Results 1 - 20
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
In fact, – in addition to the cases from the transition period – the choice of law rules of the Rome I and Rome II-Regulations previously incorporated into the domestic law, remained applicable as so-called retained EU law (REUL) due to their universal character (loi uniforme).[15] However, this approach was not appropriate for legal acts revolving around the principle of reciprocity, particularly in International Civil Procedure.[16] Hence, a legal stocktaking… [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
And, indeed, in this aspect, it is not truth or credibility that is important, it is the acceptability or praiseworthiness of the idea, fact etc. advanced, that tales center stage. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:05 am
For example, in the Bosnia v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
Therefore, by applying the same principles in the aforesaid guiding case, certain other characteristics, such as sexual orientation and household registration may o be regarded as falling within the scope of Protected Characteristics. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
In addition to being leveraged, trading in the assets was not limited to eligible contract participants, and did not result in actual delivery of the underlying commodities (bitcoin and ether in this case) within 28 days, rendering them retail commodity transactions under the CEA.10 Even though the leveraged trades that constituted retail commodity transactions were offered by an unaffiliated third party, the CFTC charged 0x with engaging in unlawful off-exchange futures dealing, finding 0x… [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
” Both cases she cited, United States v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
In a similar case, InterDigital v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Youngstown and United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
It also highlights and partially explores the difference in the United States and Australian copyright laws with a few case studies of legal issues surrounding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander artworks in Australia. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:36 pm
(Basu v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
They were issued 38 years ago and likely to be outdated. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:57 pm
Consider the case of Wheeler v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm
Perhaps you are thinking of filing a veteran-owned small business status protest against a competitor SDVOSB or VOSB that just won a VA award, or maybe your veteran-owned status has been challenged by a competitor; in either case, what follows is an overview of the process to give you an idea of what to expect. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am
State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
