Search for: "United States v. American Commercial Lines"
Results 1 - 20
of 766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
One example is United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 43. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
China has developed strong relationswith U.S. allies and adversaries alike, building robust commercial ties all along the way. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
-NAP, one that might appeal to the incoming American administration--by focusing on disclosure, transparency and information sharing. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
United Farm Workers Nat. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Alessandro Maurini, The Missed Revolution at the Origins of the United States (2022). 6. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:09 pm
One case highlighted is Gbarabe v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am
Making videos of small animals being crushed by high heels may be protected First Amendment activity (really, see United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
Fifth, there is a state action overlay when it comes to Big Tech censorship (see Missouri v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
This means that, although it may be inferred through the presence of a robust federal regulatory regime, there is not always a bright-line rule for whether a specific state policy will be preempted. [read post]
