Search for: "United States v. American Precision Products Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And that is precisely what we’d like to do today—speak to you directly. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am by Bernard Bell
  Reducing Industrial Accidents Industrial accidents have long caused carnage in the United States.[2] Generally employers can enhance their employees’ safety in two distinct non-exclusive ways. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But Industria does not advertise or sell its Zenú or Ranchera products in the United States and there are no market surveys specific to the United States for Zenú or Ranchera. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
  The sole member followed the advice of Skadden and caused the Boardwalk MLP general partner to exercise the call right and acquire all the public units pursuant to a formula in the Partnership Agreement. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
The damages award included $240,000 for infringing products sold directly into the United States, $2 million for infringing products sold to foreign customers who intended to ultimately sell those products into the United States, and $87 million for infringing products sold abroad and that were not designated for resale into the U.S., although a portion of those sales displaced foreign sales for Hetronic. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
The damages award included $240,000 for infringing products sold directly into the United States, $2 million for infringing products sold to foreign customers who intended to ultimately sell those products into the United States, and $87 million for infringing products sold abroad and that were not designated for resale into the U.S., although a portion of those sales displaced foreign sales for Hetronic. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am by Robert B. Milligan
Assessing Misappropriation on Summary Judgment In Precision Indus. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In American Needle, the Court stripped the National Football League of Section 1 immunity by holding that the NFL is not entitled to the single entity defense under Copperweld and instead, its conduct must be analyzed under the “flexible” rule of reason.[25] And last year, in NCAA v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court famously proclaimed American antitrust law to be a “consumer welfare prescription” in Reiter v. [read post]