Search for: "United States v. Any and All Radio Station Equipment" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2023, 11:45 am by Ben Sperry
In which geographic area must the consensus exist (California, or the United States, or the world)? [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:25 am by INFORRM
In addition, the case relates to the arbitrary denial of a broadcasting license and the seizure of radio station equipment. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:28 am by Scott R. Flick and Elizabeth Craig
Any electronic device which intentionally emits radio frequency energy must be authorized before it can be marketed within the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 5:00 pm by FHH Law
EEO Public File Reports – All radio and television station employment units with five or more full-time employees and located in Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas must place EEO Public File Reports in their OPIFs. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:42 am by Larry
Rather, under the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 5:33 am by Sean Quirk
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a radio interview that “Taiwan has not been a part of China. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
  Much of the guidance issued by OSHA during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has originated from guidance from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”). [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 1:16 pm by FHH Law
EEO Public File Reports – All radio and television station employment units with five or more full-time employees and located in Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas must place EEO Public File Reports in their OPIFs. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:38 am by FHH Law
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Public File Reports – All radio and television station employment units with five (5) or more full-time employees located in Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas must place EEO Public File Reports in their public inspection files. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Hilary Hurd
The 2014 terrorist attack at the Kunming railway station did not amount to hostilities that might arguably trigger international humanitarian law rather than IHRL, as the attacks were not characterized by sufficient “intensity and organization” under Prosecutor v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:19 am by Mary B. McCord
  And he deplored as “wrong-headed” the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
  Removing the standard provides no guidance at all, unless the Commission has signaled that it cannot anticipate a problem with any carrier offer to exempt specific types of traffic from debiting a monthly data allowance. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
  Removing the standard provides no guidance at all, unless the Commission has signaled that it cannot anticipate a problem with any carrier offer to exempt specific types of traffic from debiting a monthly data allowance. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Ahmed Bin Mubarak, Yemen’s ambassador to the United States, denied reports that his government had withdrawn permission for the United States to carry out ground missions, but made clear that “in the future there needs to be more coordination with Yemeni authorities before any operation and that there needs to be consideration for our sovereignty. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:39 pm by F. Paul Pittman
One notable example involved a report that researchers were able to remotely access a car and change the car’s air-conditioning settings, switch the volume and station on the radio, turn on the windshield wipers, and display a picture of the researchers on the digital dashboard screen from 10 miles away. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm by Benjamin Wittes
A federal judge ordered his release in March 2010, but the United States government has fought that order. [read post]