Search for: "United States v. Barnett"
Results 1 - 20
of 585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am
Dodd-Frank added a provision that says that such a law is preempted “only if” it “prevents or significantly interferes with the exercise by the national bank of its powers,” and goes on to specify that courts are to apply “the legal standard for preemption in the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Barnett Bank [v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
In an unusual move, the United States filed a brief supporting further review. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:36 am
A. v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Raoul, Barnett v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
: The Role of Barnette in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
Babak Sarani, et al., Wounding Patterns Based on Firearm Type in Civilian Public Mass Shootings in the United States, 228 J. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
by Dennis Crouch In Roku, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am
Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
United States, which declared unconstitutional provisions of the Brady Act. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
The SIFI classification—which is currently limited to the largest banks in the United States—enables increased scrutiny by the U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
The case could set up a major test for gun rights for the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm
[Only one federal firearms prohibitor does not require any specfic finding of fact] On November 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the only Second Amendment merits case this term, United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
