Search for: "United States v. Bayer"
Results 1 - 20
of 281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 3:40 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Generally, a party “is ‘[o]ne by or against whom a lawsuit is brought,’ ” United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
Bayer's settlement includes settlement for all United States consumers who purchased the products within a specified timeframe that has yet to be determined. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
Bayer's settlement includes settlement for all United States consumers who purchased the products within a specified timeframe that has yet to be determined. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
What if Bayer started using FLANAX in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 1:15 pm
The Mirena IUD was first marketed in the United States in 2000. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:35 pm
Part IV explores the status of computerized recording systems throughout the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:32 pm
On August 24, 2010, Karl Bayer, Special Master, filed his Report and Recommendations to United States District Judge Sam Sparks regarding the construction of claims in United States Patent No.'s 6,514,640 and 5.910,382 in the Hydro-Quebec and The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:08 pm
Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:26 am
The long-running saga of Bayer v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Bayer withdrew the drug after it was linked to 31 deaths in the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:06 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed the TTAB's ruling in Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:48 am
United States is here. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 6:01 pm
The “[p]laintiffs in all of the actions currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (except for Williams et al v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm
Bayer Corp., 564 U.S. ---, 131 S.Ct. 2368, 2011 WL 768649 (6/16/11) (blogged here) the Supreme Court of the United States held that a District Court's denial of a Rule 23 class certification motion does not prevent separate plaintiffs from seeking certification in a separate state court action. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:17 pm
On August 31, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States granted a petition for writ of certiorari in The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:35 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States [Bayer], to assert priority rights over a mark that… [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:37 am
Bayer Corporation, and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
