Search for: "United States v. COMMANDING OFFICER, ETC."
Results 1 - 20
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
That's contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
-NAP exhibits all of the weaknesses and missed opportunities that has marked the NAP process for many developed states: it focuses on outward conduct and pays little attention to the human rights effects of economic activity within the United States; it is grounded in the prerogatives of executive command; it provides little assessment of the legal and remedial framework of the United States and its relationship to managing business conduct; and… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
United States) or whether an issue lacks "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" to apply as law (such as political gerrymandering claims, as in Rucho v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
First, the Amars assume—without any analysis—the phrases "Officers of the United States" and "Office under the United States" both had the same meaning in 1788 and in 1868. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
And, indeed, in this aspect, it is not truth or credibility that is important, it is the acceptability or praiseworthiness of the idea, fact etc. advanced, that tales center stage. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Youngstown and United States v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am
Speech acts consist of actual conduct, such as promising, commanding, apologizing, etc.[1] The law has long implicitly recognized the distinction between factual assertions or statements and speech acts. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 7:11 am
The only other mention of religion in the United States Constitution is the prohibition against religious tests “as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States,” which is contained in Article VI. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Indo-Pacific Command. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
II, Sec. 4 provides that “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:38 am
I think you’ll find my summer 2017 Lawfare piece (the one I cite above, concerning Cyber Command and the Islamic State) helpful on this question. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm
In short, the NCD and Office of the NCD would resemble the structure of the Office of the United States Trade Representative, albeit with a smaller scale. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am
Etc.) [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:46 pm
The reason why such evils as dogmatism, empiricism, commandism, tailism, sectarianism, bureaucracy and an arrogant attitude in work are definitely harmful and intolerable, and why anyone suffering from these maladies must overcome them, is that they alienate us from the masses. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:14 am
The connection with accounting remained, but reduced to a dimension increasingly rejected by Western society as abhorrent to its ideals emerging from the Enlightenment (famously in Dostoevsky, Brothers Karamazov (Constance Garnett, trans.: NY Lowell Press) Bk V, Chp V, The Grand Inquisitor)). [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the… [read post]
