Search for: "United States v. Central Pacific Railroad Company" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
§§ 934-939), which provided that “[t]he right of way through the public lands of the United States is granted to any railroad company” meeting certain requirements, “to the extent of one hundred feet on each side of the central line of said road. [read post]
25 Dec 2024, 3:43 am
§1035.1)    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
While central Pennsylvania remained largely agricultural, the eastern part of the state became known for its abundant coal mines and railroad hubs designed to transport raw materials to the western part of the state, where steel was being produced. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Ashutosh Bhagwat
United States, the Supreme Court recognized the possibility that Section 1 of the Sherman Act can be violated when competitors all agree with a central actor to act in an anticompetitive way—what is today called a “hub-and-spoke conspiracy. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Department or Homeland Security issued a “National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) Bulletin,” warning of, “a heightened threat environment across the United States,” and, “violent riots have continued in recent days,” and, “ideologically-motivated actors” could incite further violence. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  The central claim of The Interbellum Constitution is that a distinct constitutional world existed in the United States between the end of the War of 1812, in 1815, and the beginning of the Civil War, in 1861. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]