Search for: "United States v. Corley"
Results 1 - 20
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
United States Jaycees (1984) 468 U.S. 609, 629, 104 S.Ct. 3244, 82 L.Ed.2d 462. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
On Tuesday, "[a]fter carefully considering the briefing and conducting oral argument on August 3, 2023," Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Qualcomm's motion for summary judgment in its entirety: In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 17-md-02773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Microsoft & Activision Blizzard was lively, and that is primarily so because Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had interesting and challenging questions for both parties--plus a great sense of humor. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 12:20 pm
This week has been as sad as it has been bad for the United States Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed (further to a motion by the merging parties) to schedule up to five trial days, the first one of which will be Thursday (June 22). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
Davila--the Meta-Within judge--helped out Judge Corley by entering a TRO: Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
I assume the case will be deemed as related to the private class-action-style lawsuit in San Francisco and assigned to United States District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
These are the overlaps between MTD and PI: If the MTD succeeds, the PI is dead by definition (which is exactly what happened in the last round).The absence of irreparable harm to the "gamers" who act on the class-action lawyers' (and by now potentially also Sony's) behalf appears to be the basis on which Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will presumably deny the PI motion. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 12:54 am
I quoted several passages from the Epic Games v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:12 am
At the first FTC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:48 pm
"There are many better class-action law firms in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm
About a month ago, Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California further narrowed the class-action lawsuit against Qualcomm that sought to piggyback on FTC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:23 pm
Before the case was reassigned to Judge Corley, that motion hearing was scheduled for February 10. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:20 am
First, the document:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:22 pm
Judge Corley has just granted the latter:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm
While FTC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 5:13 am
Illinois Brick could have been overruled in Apple v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:55 am
From Reade v. [read post]