Search for: "United States v. Donato"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am
"Remember, remember, the 5th 6th of November" (and the 12th of September):Judge James Donato of the United States District has formally approved a case schedule negotiated between Google and the Google Play Store antitrust plaintiffs (three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and a consumer class action) and set the In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:22-cv-2746-JD, N.D. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:05 am
Here are the materials in Donato v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 8:32 pm
But above all, it's a chance for three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and the consumer class-action plaintiffs to argue that an adverse inference is warranted (or, as a fallback position, a curative instruction).If not for the Epic Games v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
United States (9th Cir. 1989) (no right of access to ex parte warrant application before indictment); States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The motion proposes an evidentiary hearing over this issue.This is only the latest example of United States et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:08 pm
Pension Fund v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:29 am
Google's counterproposal is October 23, arguing that the plaintiffs' proposal "will likely conflict with the trial in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:51 am
Techs., LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:21 am
" Google opposes any trial date earlier than November 6 because of a potential conflict with the trial in the first United States et al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
Nov. 18, 2022), the Honorable James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss claims brought against defendants Coca-Cola, Blue Triton Brands, and Niagara Bottling (collectively the “Defendants”) by plaintiff individuals and Sierra Club (“Plaintiffs”). [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 1:34 am
Yesterday (Friday, March 31) the DOJ filed its reply brief in support of its motion for sanctions: United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am
By coincidence, that was the day the United States Department of Justice and eight state AGs filed a second Unite States et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:14 am
" Xilinx, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had entered the following order on Tuesday (November 15):"The request by plaintiffs Epic and Match to file amended complaints, [...], is granted. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:33 am
" United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:10 am
At-will employee’s claims of wrongful termination and defamation rejected by courtDiLacio v New York City Dist. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold a trial starting November 6. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 2:12 am
"Should Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California considered that Rule 37(e)(2)(B) remedy overreaching, the plaintiffs at least want a Rule 37(e)(1) "curative jury instruction. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]
