Search for: "United States v. Gregory Rogers" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 43. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
John Rogers says he is ready to fight the charges and seek another term in the Alabama Legislature. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Kristina Lorch, John Sullivan Baker
Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan, Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas, and Senior Circuit Judge Judith Rogers will hear the case. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge dismissed the $250 million defamation lawsuit filed by high school student Nicholas Sandmann against The Washington Post. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
  The political economy of international standard setting in financial reporting: how the United States led the adoption of IFRS across the world. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
Josh Blackman examined the flaws in the Article II analysis of Judge Roger Gregory concurring opinion in IRAP v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:10 am by Vanessa Sauter
Sarah Grant provided an update on the United States v. al-Nashiri proceedings. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner, Amira Mikhail
In a lengthy and comprehensive opinion for the majority, Chief Judge Roger Gregory focuses on the central issue in the case: whether the Constitution “protects Plaintiffs’ right to challenge an Executive Order that in the text speaks with vague words of national security, but in context drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
Judge Gregory’s opinion did not rule on the challengers’ claim that the revised order was likely to be struck down as a violation of federal immigration law as it deals with the power of the president to exclude foreign nationals from the United States. [read post]