Search for: "United States v. Lawing"
Results 1 - 20
of 68,547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm
United States of America (Cultural Resource Damages; Resource Equivalency Analysis) United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:29 am
After being denied more information about the valuation, plaintiffs sued, alleging that the units were worth at least $60.00 per unit. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
For these reasons, we recommend that the agencies withdraw these questions or explain their relevance to the antitrust laws and this inquiry. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:55 am
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:52 am
United States turns on the line between a bribe and a gratuity. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:06 am
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
United States (1895), the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
United States closely, not only because I am interested in bribery and illegal gratuities law but also because I based my Legislation course final exam on the case. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
I have chosen these three because they reflect broader patterns in Trump’s agenda: each would be enormously consequential, directly attacking at least several hundred thousand long-time residents of the United States; each would exploit pre-existing weaknesses in the immigration enforcement regime that render it susceptible to actors interested in undermining the rule of law; and each would sow fear throughout immigrant communities, even if it does not… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:33 am
United States, that federal bribery law does not make ti a crime for state and local officials to accept gratuities that may be given as a token of appreciation after the official act. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Expect the same from me and/or my co-bloggers for the rest of the week and possibly into next week if the Term is extended.In the meantime, before you log into SCOTUSblog or start refreshing the webpage open to the SCOTUS homepage every ten seconds, I thought I'd offer some morning snark about the dishonesty or incompetence on display in Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
One way to get around spending 10 years in the US to overcome 212(a)(9)(B) inadmissibility is if the applicant is eligible for a waiver under INA §212(a)(b)(b)(v), which is based on a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying relative such as a spouse or parent is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
The United States was born in rage. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Several state supreme courts have since followed the Supreme Court’s example, finding their state antitrust laws are inapplicable to baseball. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
In this case, the UN system in general, and more specifically the UN apparatus in Geneva under the institutions of the OHCHR has traditionally assumed the representative role of administrator of law, norms, and guidance, touching on human rights along a particular interpretive path. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 5:18 pm
The European Court of Human Rights unanimously found Tuesday that Russia was guilty of a pattern of human rights violations since 2014 in Crimea under the European Convention on Human Rights (Convention) and international humanitarian law, in its ruling on the case Ukraine v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:59 pm
The circuits were split about whether state RFRAs provided a defense to state employment discrimination laws. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:59 pm
Our eighteen-person seminar, comprised of both second-year and third-year law students, focused on the ways in which the United States Constitution and subnational constitutions can protect and preserve a healthy, healthful environment for current and future generations. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:18 am
Furthermore, the PDP Project proposal must now include information on “intellectual property, exclusivity contracts or commercial agreements, including details of any agreements or restrictions on licensing or 3rd-party access to the technology” (Annex CX, article 8, V). [read post]
