Search for: "United States v. Mohamud" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2023, 6:59 am by Sarah Taitz
A version of this argument spilled out in public in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:51 am by George Croner
The language used by Congress in Section 702 directs the FISC to satisfy itself that these targeting, minimization, and querying procedures are “consistent with [Section 702] and with the fourth amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 6:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States concerns the scope of jurisdiction in federal criminal cases. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by Rachael Hanna
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:22 pm by Andrew Crocker
The Supreme Court announced today that it will not review a lower court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:45 pm by India McKinney
In 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the use of Section 702 in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:45 pm by India McKinney
In 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the use of Section 702 in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:13 pm by Joseph Jones
Skelton to have been acting “in the course of employment”, adopting a broad interpretation of the scope of employment (consistent with past case law: Bazely v Curry [1999 174 D.L.R. 4th 45], Lister [2001 UKHL 22] and Mohamud [2016 UKSC 11]). [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 8:16 am by Kate Tummarello
Most recently, we saw a troubling decision out of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
Orin Kerr responded to April Doss’s earlier post on United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 11:20 am by Orin Kerr
Over at Lawfare, I have a long post criticizing the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]