Search for: "United States v. Mouat"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
II,§ 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Mouat (1888) and United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:23 pm
II, § 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
He didn't invoke Smith or Mouat or Free Enterprise Fund. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
Fund v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am
” In United States v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
Mouat, 124 U.S. 303, 307 (1888) (an elected official is not, "strictly speaking, an officer of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
For the very sensible reasons explained by the Supreme Court of the United States in Powell v. [read post]