Search for: "United States v. One Package of Merchandise"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
’”[1] It offers some enhanced protections to visual artists working in the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 3:58 am
The trademark owner will simultaneously receive information (including, under specified circumstances, samples) concerning the merchandise or, if applicable, its retail packaging. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
And can you explain how historically the rules that you just discussed relating to athletic compensation to athletes, the transfer rules, that whole package that you just laid out for us, in what way does that impact gender equity issues in college sports? [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 6:55 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm
By “valid mark,” I mean a mark that meets the requirements for one in the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:36 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:47 am
If a service has $500k in merchandise sales (gross revenue), but only keeps $50k in commissions (net revenue), is it covered by the law or not? [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:27 am
LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:34 am
The statute also provides a 5% safe-harbor provision, providing that “[t]his section shall not apply to merchandise made, manufactured, or produced in the United States that has one or more articles, units, or parts from outside of the United States, if all of the articles, units, or parts of the merchandise obtained from outside the United States constitute not more than 5 percent of the final… [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am
United States is a case about the classification of used clothing coming into the United States.The plaintiff imported bales of used clothing and classified the merchandise in HTSUS item 6309.00.00 as "worn clothing," which is a duty free. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:24 pm
United States, 581 F.3d 1369, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:31 pm
National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 10:32 am
United States, newly minted U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:07 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
The imported merchandise consists of a nine-piece Santa Claus costume packaged and sold together as a set. [read post]
