Search for: "United States v. One Parcel Property"
Results 1 - 20
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The Court noted public employees’ First Amendment right, in certain circumstances, to speak as . . . citizen[s] addressing matters of public concern,” and observed that “editorial control over speech and speakers on [the public employee’s] properties or platforms” is “part and parcel” of that right. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
The United States appears poised to heed that call with the small fraction of Russian frozen assets subject to U.S. jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
The second part of this year yielded several cases addressing instances of workplace violence, including one case involving a third-party attack and another an assault by a co-worker. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm
With that as an introduction, here is a brief description of the main challenges property owners can assert against condemning entities: Public Use: The Constitutions of Michigan and the United States allow government-authorized entities to condemn property for “public use. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
”[9] When the Little Tucker Act was enacted in 1887, and when the statute of limitations was later amended in 1948, a suit “against the United States” was a suit naming the United States as a party in its collective capacity, or one in which the United States was considered an indispensable party to the suit, typically because a judgment against the defendant would obligate public funds, command specific… [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
The Plan included three elementary schools (one already in existence), one middle school, and one high school (previously planned and already under construction). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
Sigalit v Kahlon Last week, in Sigalit v Kahlon, 21-cv-08921 (SDNY Aug. 30, 2023) United States District Judge Analisa Torres granted the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on an accounting claim. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court, Sackett v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:11 am
Property, LLC v Butler County, OH, 2023 WL 3270901 (6th Cir. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Eight years ago, Breyer used his dissent in Glossip v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:30 am
On the one hand, China represents an unprecedented challenge to the United States and other open societies. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
In Congress and in statehouses throughout the United States, lawmakers continue to introduce legislation designed to bar citizens of foreign adversaries from being able to purchase real property. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
Save the El Dorado Ditch v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:57 pm
Parcels 3C (formerly part of a larger unit called Parcel 3) and 4A are the former sites of the residential properties condemned in the Kelo litigation. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
Person A owns a 20-acre vacant parcel. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The FPA requires entities seeking to operate a dam, reservoir, or hydroelectric power plant in the United States to secure licensure from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). [read post]
