Search for: "United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 11:16 pm
This one entertains me becaues it faintly evokes the studio system of the 1930's and the decades of antitrust action by the FTC, with United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 1:52 pm
” The decrees, a result of the landmark 1948 Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:23 am
Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 U.S. 131 (1948). [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:49 am
"Usually it's not outright thievery by the studios, but death by contract," Bloomberg quotes Pierce O'Donnel, the Los Angeles-based lawyer who represented the late columnist Art Buchwald in a successful case against Viacom Inc,s Paramount Pictures in 1988. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
Marie-Andree Weiss of The 1709 Blog discusses the Paramount Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
In Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:44 am
South Bend, Indiana - Indiana patent lawyers for CeraMedic LLC of Plano, Texas sued for patent infringement in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc., both of Warsaw, Indiana (collectively "Zimmer"), infringed "Sintered Al₂O₃ Material, Process for Its Production and Use of the Material," Patent No. 6,066,584, which has been issued by the United States Patent Office. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
Paramount Pictures that was discussed in a previous article, and there was the false light claim made in Olivia De Havilland v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
Paramount Pictures Corp., 544 N.W.2d 21, 26 (Minn. 1996). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 2:56 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
§105, as a “work of the United States Government”? [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am
” “Collateral estoppel and res judicata protect litigants from repetitive lawsuits, promotes judicial economy, and preserves the integrity of the judicial system (Paramount Pictures Corp. v Allianz Risk Transfer AG, 31 NY3d 64, 73 [2018] [Paramount]). [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:02 pm
United States (1969 Trade Cases ¶72,730) and United States v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
Instead, ´what is critical is how the work in question appears to the reasonable observer’ (following Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) and Leibovitz v Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109, 113-14 (2d Cir 1998). [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:19 pm
Federal and state laws require similar elements to prove misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
Canada In the case of Paramount v. [read post]
