Search for: "United States v. Santiago Santiago" Results 1 - 20 of 186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:26 am by Just Security
Analyzing State Employment Authorization for Noncitizens in the US by Ahilan Arulanantham (@ahilan_toolong) FISA Surveillance Reform The Year of Section 702 Reform, Part V: The HPSCI Majority FISA Working Group Report by Elizabeth Goitein (@LizaGoitein) and Noah Chauvin (@NoahChauvin) Biden Administration: Spy Tools The Biden Administration Should Continue Rebuffing NSO Group’s Latest Lobbying Efforts by Talya Nevins, Nicole Mo and Carrie DeCell (@cmd_dc) Supreme Court Ethics… [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Debra Perlin
While prosecuting a former president of the United States is unprecedented, other democracies have prosecuted former heads of state for criminal misconduct before. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 3:21 am by INFORRM
The State Defense Council challenged this decision before the Court of Appeals of Santiago. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
It was nicely summarized, even in an environment friendly to ESG analytics, in instruments such as the Santiago Principles (Principle 19: "The SWF’s investment decisions should aim to maximize risk-adjusted financial returns in a manner consistent with its investment policy, and based on economic and financial grounds. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 5:56 am by Ambassador David Scheffer
However, a defense unit can deal with uncooperative defendants or obtain counsel for a defendant who cannot afford legal representation. 5. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1614, 1618 (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Around the same time as when Jimmy Lai made public statements calling for sanctions, the United States passed a legislation imposing financial sanctions on officials of China and the HKSAR. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 10:42 am by Russell Knight
This presumption is rebuttable and can be overcome by irrefragable proof” Santiago v. [read post]