Search for: "United States v. Stokes"
Results 1 - 20
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Biklen and Camara Stokes Hudson of counsel), for The New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, amicus curiae.The New York City Bar Association, New York (Amber Leary, Emily G. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Biklen and Camara Stokes Hudson of counsel), for The New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, amicus curiae.The New York City Bar Association, New York (Amber Leary, Emily G. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Part V reexamines case law that Blackman and Tillman rely on. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:18 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Mata v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
Cargill, Guedes v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Biden, 22-1225Issues: (1) Whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for dismissal as moot under United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
In 2020, 74 million voters from across the United States voted for Trump. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Surveillance On 12 September 2023, The European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Wieder and Guarnieri v. the United Kingdom (nos. 64371/16 and 64407/16). [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
The propaganda strategy is not meant for the state apparatus of competitor states. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
” In 2021 we published an article concluding “that the President is not a Section 3 ‘officer of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
See, e.g., Stencil v. [read post]