Search for: "United States v. THREE PARCELS OF LAND, ETC."
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
Project Background and Litigation History The Specific Plan covered 13 parcels comprising 797 acres, with a proposed development including up to 4,340 dwelling units with a maximum population increase of 15,928 new residents, as well as other uses including mixed use commercial, parks, open space, and schools. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
It contemplated that additional TDRs not accounted for in the PEIR’s land use assumptions were possible in the future and stated that additional traffic analysis and CEQA review would be necessary if and when the same were proposed. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Gonzales, Jessica Gonzales sued for the death of her three daughters when the state refused to help her save them from their murderous father. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
(HERE).The Conference brought together some of the most important and influential thinkers about the fundamentals of law in general, and that of the United States in particular. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
The Litigation And The Trial Court’s Order Plaintiff’s ensuing lawsuit alleged three CEQA claims. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Furthermore, subsequent zoning actions may be relevant to both land value and damages, or special benefits. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit,… [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 2:31 pm
Adams v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making--The States and the People; Popular referendums. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
EXEMPTIONS Golden Gate Land Holding, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]