Search for: "United States v. Washington, III" Results 1 - 20 of 985
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm by Steven Calabresi
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
Washington State, along with the majority of states, has chosen to regulate Class III gaming through these compacts. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:39 am
While the VICP covers most of the vaccines that the CDC currently recommends for routine administration in the United States, there are exceptions. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am by Marcia Coyle
United States, the justices will decide if Idaho’s Defense of Life Act is “pre-empted,” or blocked, because it conflicts with the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
 This is dispositive proof that the Presidency is also not an "office *** under the United States" for the purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The post Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
Consistent with Washington’s long-standing concern in that regard, the U.K. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 3:45 pm by Kalvis Golde
State Bank of India 23-390Issue: Whether, to establish a “direct effect in the United States” under 28 U.S.C. [read post]