Search for: "United States vs. Alexander"
Results 1 - 20
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Zhang, Qi, Alexander A. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:43 am
Additionally, it stated that “works containing otherwise unprotectable material that has been edited, modified, or revised by a human author can be registered, but in this case, there was insufficient evidence of such changes. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm
Scientific studies, reviews, and meta-analyses are virtually never directly admissible in evidence in courtrooms in the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
THE RESPONSIBLE ART MARKET AND AGENCY IN THE ART WORLD The discrete nature of the art market has led to its vulnerability to money laundering and fraud through private and often anonymous transactions. [1]Recently, the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union took steps to address this opaqueness and create a more compliant and fair market.[2] These strides towards a more principled market have been shown through the EU’s 5th Directive and the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm
The post <i>Chevron</i> Deference vs. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:37 pm
To my great delight, I was asked to review Jan Broekman's brilliant new work, Knowledge in Change: The Semiotics of Cognition and Conversation (Springer Nature, 2023). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:43 am
§ 241 (DOJ Explainer) Conspiracy to Commit Offense or to Defraud United States 18 U.S.C § 371 Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
In a press release, Panasonic stated it expects ‘relevant actions will develop and proceed in parallel in Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), the newly established European Unified Patent Court (UPC) and China’. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[8] In Federalist 71, Alexander Hamilton argued that a key role of the Executive Branch is to make decisions carefully under pressure: to undertake “cool and sedate reflection. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:27 am
Alexander Oscar, president of the Organization of the Jews in Bulgaria “Shalom” explained their absence from the event by saying, “Nobody from the community would have taken part in an event honoring the imaginary role of King Boris in rescuing the Bulgarian Jews and presenting a distorted history of the Holocaust. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
In state courts, gatekeeping is a very uneven process. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:05 am
For example, DPR leader Alexander Borodai was in daily contact with Vladislav Surkov, then a close advisor to Putin. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 8:55 pm
Joshua Cutler (Boise State University, College of Business and Economics, Department of Accountancy) has posted Hamilton vs. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 12:00 am
The actions, which were initiated in the United States and Germany – in the District Court of Massachusetts and the Regional Court of Düsseldorf – are directed at two messenger RNA (“mRNA”) technologies that Moderna alleges Pfizer and BioNTech have duplicated in the development of their Comirnaty® vaccine. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
“The Hague Judgments Convention in the United States: A ‘Game Changer’ or a New Path to the Old Game? [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
Under Secretary of State Nuland on Accelerating Aid to Ukraine and Sanctions Against Russiaby Viola Gienger (@ViolaGienger) (March 9, 2022) Humanitarian Corridors in Ukraine: Impasse, Ploy or Narrow Passage of Hope? [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:25 pm
“The Hague Judgments Convention in the United States: A ‘Game Changer’ or a New Path to the Old Game? [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
Some critics of a carbon tax argue it is not a real solution to correct the inefficiencies created by carbon emissions; instead, they say the only real solution to climate change is innovation, with a tax on carbon emissions being a distraction.[3] While it is true that innovation is a major reason why carbon emissions have not grown in the United States over the past decade, carbon taxes would kick innovation into a higher gear. [read post]
