Search for: "VOLKSWAGEN V US" Results 1 - 20 of 317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm by Will Newman
I think maybe a more fitting observation (and one that Gemini noted in the Apple v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
The CJEU’s settled case-law, as established in such decisions, is that the use by a third party of a sign identical or similar to one’s trade mark implies that such third party uses the sign in its own ‘commercial communication’. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:25 pm by Mark Ashton
As practicing attorneys, we have all seen the case where one parent suggests the child look at a used Volkswagen only to see the other parent deliver the keys to a new Audi A4 as a sweet 16 gift. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am by Florian Mueller
As for the value of "the patent's inclusion in the standard," it's worth nothing that even Justice Mellor's InterDigital v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 8:45 am
The data is then used to rate each vehicle from one to five stars, with five stars being the highest rating available. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But an analysis shows fewer women are using federal funds to cover childcare expenses this election cycle. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The ClientEarth action is an innovative use of litigation to encourage better corporate governance by holding a company’s directors personally liable for failing to properly prepare for the net zero transition. [read post]