Search for: "VOWELL v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
NY State created a postmortem right of publicity specifically for computer-generated likenesses; Louisiana did so too. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:33 am
As stated above, in a perfect rhyme the last stressed vowel and all following sounds are identical in both words.If the sound preceding the stressed vowel is also identical, the rhyme is sometimes considered to be inferior and not a perfect rhyme after all. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Sarah Vowell weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
’” Applicant acknowledged that “the parties’ marks are visually similar because they both contain the vowels and letters IELA/IELLA in the same order and combination. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Hebrew presents special problems inasmuch as it does not include vowels in its classical written form, but similar problems quickly emerge with any and all exercises trying to convey the meaning of the words on a page. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Low-consonant, low-frequency vowel names for large cars; high-consonant, high vowel frequency brand name for fast cars. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
That mark would be pronounced as two syllables and not three, contrary to what the Board of Appeal stated as an alternative in its decision. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
”14 Verbal fillers appear in all languages and are typically monosyllabic with a schwa core vowel sound.15 Speakers of English use uh and um. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by SHG
  Oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:13 am
486/07, Ford Motor Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Unnecessarily Long and Pompous Name), Alkar Automotive, SA. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:54 am by SHG
  This was the rule since Marbury v. [read post]