Search for: "Valencia v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
U.S. support and advice to Israel has recently focused on limiting civilian deaths, and yesterday, Israeli government spokesperson Eylon Levy said, “we are going to continue with our campaign to destroy Hamas, a campaign that the United States sees eye to eye with us about. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
And, as with other useful arts, the United States, and most other countries, recognize the importance of protecting the intellectual property rights of the designers, inventors, artisans and engineers responsible for creating furniture designs. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
United States, and Valencia v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:48 am
Referring to the backlash, she discussed the issues at stake, especially the aftermath of the overturn of Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 12:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 11:27 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
Scott Anderson, Suzanne Maloney, Natan Sachs and Hady Amr spoke about the meaning of the deal for the domestic political environments of Israel, Iran and the United States, its potential impact on the Palestinians and how the agreement could change regional dynamics more broadly: Daniel Byman discussed how a new administration could more effectively combat rising white supremacist violence in the United States. [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:30 am
The deal’s predictably less good for minorities because the bargaining’s done in a locked unit. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 5:02 am
From United States v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:21 am
From Daurbigney v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 3:22 pm
Great news from the Ninth couldn’t come at a better time.United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:41 am
In Valencia v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:29 am
In Other News… United States Secretary of State Rex Tillerson this month appeared to moderate hawkish comments he made on the South China Sea at his confirmation hearing, where he suggested that the U.S. should deny China access to the islands it claims in the South China Sea. [read post]
