Search for: "Van Orden v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2005, 10:53 am
The US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had previously ruled [PDF] in Van Orden v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:05 am
Supreme Court challenge in Van Orden v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court in the Van Orden case. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court in Van Orden v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 1:41 pm
American Humanists Association, and the 2005 case Van Orden v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:05 am
Supreme Court's decision in Van Orden v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 12:15 am
Supreme Court decision, Van Orden v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 7:09 am
By the way, the 10 Commandments monument in Pleasant Grove is basically identical to the monument in Van Orden. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:25 am
Ritter's letter suggests that the Court's 2005 decision in Van Orden v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 1:00 pm
In Van Orden v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
In Van Orden v. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), Van Orden v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am
ACLU of Kentucky and Van Orden v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
The District Court granted summary judgment for the Commission and the American Legion, concluding that the Cross satisfies both the test announced in Lemon and the analysis applied by Justice Stephen Breyer in upholding a Ten Commandments monument in Van Orden v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 9:36 am
We can see these commitments in action in Van Orden v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
Recently, Scalia says, the Court is "more receptive to the needs of religious practice," citing the 2005 decision, Van Orden v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:43 am
The bill assumes a defensive and somewhat tentative posture, recognizing that it may well be deemed not to fall this side of the all-important chasm that divides Van Orden v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
Specifically, citing McCreary County v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Van Orden v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:15 am
The ... monument shall use the same words used on the monument at issue in Van Orden v. [read post]
