Search for: "Van v. Van" Results 1 - 20 of 5,883
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It is arguably a necessary power in order to meet the contingencies that arise over time.In the leading American case, Jackson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
IPSO 00418-24 Hedges and Baker v thesun.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 00666-24 Mitchison v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 22422-23 openDemocracy v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 21812-23 Vulliamy v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach –… [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:48 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
The court has also stated that the very purpose of the formal requirements imposed by Article 17 (now Article 25 of Brussels Ia) is to ensure that consensus between the parties is in fact established (Case 313/85 Iveco Fiat v Van Hool EU:C:1986:423, [5]). [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm by Frank Cranmer
: Animal Welfare Beats Freedom of Religion: yet another critical comment on the ECtHR’s judgment in Executief van de Moslims van België et al. v Belgium. [read post]
24 May 2024, 1:49 am by Tessa Shepperson
He states that the following needs to apply in order to serve a valid section 21 notice:- You are seeking possession after 4 months of the tenancy starting The property is licensed (if applicable) The deposit was put into a recognised scheme within 30 days No improvement notices have been served Any unlawful fees have been repaid A landlord also need to have served in the correct manner and at the correct time:- EPC certificate Current ‘How to Rent Guide’ Current Gas Safety Certificate… [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Magnacoustics, Inc. v Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, 303 AD2d 561, 562). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil Procedural Law, University of Bonn. [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:40 am by Frank Cranmer
In Mikyas and Others v Belgium [2024] No 50681/20 [In French], three young Muslim women complained that they were not allowed to wear the hijab at secondary schools except during religious education classes. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:29 am by Eleonora Rosati
The burden is therefore placed on the courts to triage these issues for the time being with the definitive outcome of Getty Images v Stability AI being eagerly awaited.Turning to training, a different perspective was offered from the current state of law within the European Union. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Elien Verniers, Strasbourg Observers: Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v. [read post]