Search for: "Vaughn v. State Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2025, 4:51 pm
Smith will be sworn in as president-elect during a State Bar of Texas Board of Directors meeting on June 19, 2025, and will serve as president of the State Bar of Texas from June 2026 to June 2027. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:31 am
District Chief Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:44 am
District Judge Vaughn Walker on Thursday [July 2nd] will consider arguments on whether to block Proposition 8, which amended the California constitution last November and barred gay and lesbian couples from being legally married in the state ...With tough legal hurdles to persuade federal judges to block state laws at such an early stage, legal experts say the odds are against Walker granting the injunction request. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
That state constitutional amendment barred same-sex marriage in the state, and Judge Walker's decision found Proposition 8 to be inconsistent with the federal constitution. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:17 pm
As District Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:02 pm
District Chief Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
His August 4th decision in Perry v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 9:44 am
His August 4th decision in Perry v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm
Vaughn v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:26 pm
Vaughn. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:30 am
District Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:07 am
Yadav v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:15 am
Canons Regular of the Order of the Holy Cross and (full text) in Doe 51 v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:20 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:05 pm
State Oil. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:29 am
See Reep v. [read post]
24 Sep 2016, 11:31 am
It also cited an unpublished decision in Vaughn v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:32 am
Chief Judge Vaughn Walker's decision in Perry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
Supreme CourtArgument Audio and Transcript (March 27, 2013)Merit and Amicus Briefs Filed (via American Bar Association)Opinion: United States v. [read post]
