Search for: "Verizon, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 6:40 pm
Citing to a 2004 Supreme Court case, Verizon Commc’ns., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm
Verizon Communications, Inc., 694 F.3d 1312 (Fed. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
Telesector, Inc., issued on February 28, two years after oral argument. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:02 am
Telesector, Inc., issued on February 28. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:18 am
Telesector, Inc., issued on February 28. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:32 pm
Verizon Communications, Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
# # #DECISIONL. v Verizon Communications, Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:12 am
Subsequently, the FCC did not seem to have any problem with Verizon’s billion dollar acquisition of prepaid, wireless service heavyweight Tracfone; https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-completes-tracfone-wireless-inc-acquisition and TMobile’s $1.35 billion acquisition appears similarly benign. https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-to-acquire-mint-and-ultra-mobile. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:12 am
Subsequently, the FCC did not seem to have any problem with Verizon’s billion dollar acquisition of prepaid, wireless service heavyweight Tracfone; https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-completes-tracfone-wireless-inc-acquisition and TMobile’s $1.35 billion acquisition appears similarly benign. https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-to-acquire-mint-and-ultra-mobile. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 8:20 am
The Union argues that "Plaintiff ignores the fact that he was terminated for using a commonly known racial slur" and that "[s]ince Plaintiff made race an issue when he used a racial slur, the Union had a lawful basis to balance the racial sensitivities involved. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
Washington DC. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:42 am
Although a company generally has no duty to deal with its rivals, courts have found antitrust liability in some limited scenarios when a monopolist (i) unilaterally outright refuses to sell a product to a rival that it made available to others (Verizon Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:22 pm
” The case is Matter of Verizon New York Inc., DTA No. 829240 (May 4, 2023). [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:01 pm
(“College Parent”), was owned approximately 90% by Apollo funds and 10% by Verizon Communications, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am
Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., No. 2:09-cv-257, 2011 WL 13134426, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:58 pm
SOTI Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 3:36 am
Netapp, Inc., 13 F.4th 717 (9th Cir. 2021); McCravy v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:01 am
”That disagreement and the resulting controversy creates reputational, legal, and financial risk, the group claimed, not just for Apple, but for other companies, including Bank of America, American Express, Verizon and others, according to the group’s proxy filing. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 12:48 pm
T-Mobile USA Inc., No. 4:22-cv-00760, 2023 WL 311287 (E.D. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 6:21 pm
On October 20, 2022, Maryland’s Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County issued a bench order granting summary judgment in favor of affiliates of Comcast Corporation and Verizon Communications Inc. striking down the Digital Ad Tax.[1] The state court struck the tax on the grounds that it violates the Supremacy Clause, Commerce Clause, and First Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
