Search for: "Verizon Telephone Companies v. FCC"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2021, 3:52 am
FCC, which upheld a statute that required cable systems to carry over-the-air broadcasters; and Rumsfeld v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
FCC; Rumsfeld v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:30 pm
In Mey v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:09 pm
This is because the 2018 Order allowed legacy companies like Comcast and Verizon to keep their special federal rights to infrastructure to deploy their services as cable television companies and telephone companies, but fiber broadband companies were out of luck. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 11:11 am
When a contract dispute arose between two telecommunications companies over the rates charged during the switching process of telephone call transmission, district court committed error in granting partial summary judgment to plaintiff, as it was likely that the same facts and issues would appear before the appellate court in the future after the FCC resolved certain regulatory issues. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:29 pm
Circuit heard the case of Mozilla v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 11:39 am
First, the NPRM would declare that the “mixed-use” doctrine applies to cable systems not owned by telephone companies (e.g., Comcast or Charter) as well as cable systems owned by telephone companies (e.g., AT&T and Verizon). [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
In his view, the ambiguity over whether Congress intended ISPs to be regulated as common carriers (like telephone companies) or information services (like AOL or Prodigy were at the time of the 1996 law at issue) means that the FCC cannot treat them as common carriers, because it is too major a regulatory step. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:49 am
For example, in Verizon v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:38 pm
Telecom Association v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
” City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:32 am
Circuit found in Verizon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Verizon v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:49 am
Verizon and AT&T will tame content-streaming companies’ disruptive influence. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
The FCC made these rulings at the request of the cable and telephone companies. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
However, phone network data could be a building block of that if the NSA has the right other sources to match up and correlate with what Verizon or other phone companies provide. [read post]
