Search for: "Vermont v. Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Univ. of Vermont, No. 2:22-CV-144, 2022 WL 17811359 (D.Vt. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  H/t: H-Law.In the New Yorker: "The Ghost of Bush v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:37 am by Jack Goldsmith
Dean, 342 F.3d 96, 103–04 (2d Cir. 2003) (Vermont statute). [4]. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Julia Spiegel
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
But the argument bombed in a moot session and ultimately attracted only the vote of Justice Denise Johnson in Baker v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
”  It was assumed that such adaptation would invoke Article V at the national level. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am by skelly
Ltd., a Vermont-domiciled captive insurance company, to provide insurance coverage for all of Johnson & Johnson’s risks throughout the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]