Search for: "Vermont v. Reed"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:33 am
See, United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
My friend and case-book co-editor Akhil Reed Amar believes that it is “nonsensical” to argue that there was the slightest merit to the Southern argument for secession as presented in 1860-61. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] On Thursday, February 4, 2021, we discussed the First Amendment arguments in the House of Representatives' Managers' trial memorandum. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
See Reed v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
NFIB v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
Beacon v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am
Unclear how far the Court had gone, and remains unclear; Court hasn’t taken a commercial speech case since then, though it has had Reed v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Feb. 7, 2014) (Vermont) (non-product liability). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 12:11 pm
Bradford’s Trucking, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
FEC and Vermont Right to Life Committee, et al v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:50 pm
This post come from the non-Reed Smith part of the blog.In Otis-Wisher v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
Yesterday morning the Court heard oral arguments in Reed v. [read post]
