Search for: "Versata Enterprises, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Post Grant Admin: Versata v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Petitions for Writ of Certiorari Pending: Infringement by Joint Enterprise: Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:14 am
Versata Dev. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 4:15 am
Versata Dev. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:14 pm
In 2010, the Delaware Supreme Court in Versata Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:47 pm
Sept. 9, 2010); Versata Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
Versata Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 11:42 am
Automatic Steel Products, Inc., The Supreme Court then turned its analysis to the 1960 Court of Chancery decision in Essential Enterprises v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
Versata Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:33 am
In Versata Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:47 am
Versata Enterprises, Inc., holding that a poison pill triggered when anyone bought 5% or more of the company's stock was valid under the circumstances. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:18 pm
Versata Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:26 am
Versata Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:40 am
Versata Enterprises Inc v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:19 pm
Versata Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:14 am
Versata Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:39 am
Versata Enterprises, Inc.; other posts discussing the decision are available here. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:19 pm
Versata Inc., a unit of closely held Trilogy Inc., filed an antitrust complaint with the European Commission against Germany’s SAP AG, alleging it has abused its dominant position in the enterprise software market. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:00 am
(“Versata”) and Trilogy, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:21 am
Versata Enterprises, Inc., [1] reaffirmed the value of the poison pill to boards seeking to protect and maximize stockholder value. [read post]