Search for: "View-All, Inc. v. United Parcel Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
SHAWN MATTHEW CLARK, Littler Mendelson, P.C., New York, New York, for United Parcel Service Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
SHAWN MATTHEW CLARK, Littler Mendelson, P.C., New York, New York, for United Parcel Service Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
Save the El Dorado Ditch v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:29 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., 575 U.S. 206 (2015)), the District Court held that the EEOC must only show that the charging party’s employer accommodated others “similar in their ability or inability to work” and that employees can prove pretext “by providing sufficient evidence that the employer’s policies impose a significant burden on pregnant workers” and the employer’s “legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons are… [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Thus, for instance, Norma Kristie, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm
Supreme Court in an 8-1 decision issued on June 30, 2020, in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
EXEMPTIONS Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
EXEMPTIONS Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
United Parcel Service, federal courts around the country have been grappling with the proper treatment of accommodation claims. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
“I did all those things. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Such an act would be a monster in legislation, and shock all mankind. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Juries had great discretion regarding all evidentiary issues, testimony, and any other type of evidence proffered during the trial. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm
Shafron, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 157, Transport North American Express Inc. v. [read post]
