Search for: "Virginia D. Barrett"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm
Dissenting in the case, Justice Kagan derided the major questions doctrine as a “get-out-of-text-free car[d]. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm
Here, I'd like to highlight a few items. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
” Its decision was a classic case of originalism gone awry — selective law office history which did not withstand the comprehensive historical record presented in further briefing to the Supreme Court and scholarship such as my forthcoming Virginia Law Review Article, The Founders’ Purse. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
” Its decision was a classic case of originalism gone awry — selective law office history which did not withstand the comprehensive the historical record presented in further briefing to the Supreme Court and scholarship such as my forthcoming Virginia Law Review Article, The Founders’ Purse. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Justice Gorsuch explained in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
The FTC’s odds are bad but I’d give them maybe a 10% chance of winning? [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Arizona – UA President Robbins OK’d Effort to Erase Millions in Fines Against Fraudulent Online University Yahoo News – Hannah Dreyfus and Helen Rummel (Arizona Republic) | Published: 3/27/2024 Lobbyist Richard Smotkin was ostensibly hired by the University of Arizona Foundation to help build the university’s relationship with Morocco. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:17 am
Damonta D. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
"[8] Again, "a mob of soldiery organized from the States of Maryland and Virginia, and States south of Virginia, would have defeated the inauguration of the Chief Magistrate" if not for Scott's preparations.[9] The insurrectionists of 2021 succeeded where their predecessors had failed. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
” In support of this very broad proposition, the CRSCC cites In re Griffin, in which Chief Justice Chase, sitting by designation, wrote that the disability “create[d]” by Section 3 is “to be made operative … by the legislation of congress in its ordinary course. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Barrett Jr. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
I’d probably offer excerpts from all of the different opinions in that case to offer the students a comprehensive view of where things sit today. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
§1098ee(2)(D). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm
The plaintiff in the case was Robert Mallory, a Virginia man who worked for Norfolk Southern, a Virginia-based railroad, in Virginia and Ohio. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Barrett quoted an earlier decision that described Heller’s declaration as a “passing reference. [read post]
