Search for: "WALLACE v. ARMY " Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
Wallace: Reversing course on subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 5:16 am by Ashley Deeks, Matthew Waxman
The Supreme Court has offered snippets of its view on this in some cases, stating in Fleming v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
Professor Wallace and I are among the co-authors of the law school textbook Firearms Law and the Second Amendment: Regulation, Rights, and Policy (3d ed. 2022, Aspen Pub.). [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses Miller and Tucker's claim that the American Founders were unfamiliar with dramatic technological changes in firearms — a claim that is refuted by Dupuy's data. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
Defense Secretary Ben Wallace will say today in a speech at the National Army Museum in London. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
This post is co-authored by Campbell University law professor Gregory Wallace. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 8:36 am by Doorey
Recall also the often-cited passage from the Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark case Wallace v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:34 am by Lyle Denniston
”  It would happen in a case that was aptly named New York Times Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
 I have no idea whether Arpaio is judgment-proof, but there would seem to be no small army of contestants who would be happy to make him so. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
Dorsen: I made that arrangement with the firm Wallace King, which Sedgwick absorbed as its Washington office. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
Senator Wallace Bennett (R-Utah) had originally said he would “definitely not join a filibuster” against Fortas. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
 ****************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 72 [week ending on Sunday 15 November] –  Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical | Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd | Economics of internet trolls | UK IPO scammer scammed | Video conferencing at the EPO | Warner-Lambert v Pfizer in France | African Ministerial Conference in IP | Green claims and… [read post]