Search for: "WARD v. FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2023, 1:38 pm
Zepeda v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:08 pm
So, for example, last month a federal district court in Gomes v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:38 pm
Attorney’s Office, Tax Division. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:52 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
As held in the case of Scarpuzza v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:26 am
Even if ordered, criminal courts and probation offices are wholly incapable of enforcing this type of penalty, a function the Family Court conducts on a regular basis. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:47 am
Probation Office had calculated as the city's total loss. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/37753-5.10.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Arthur Amaral, the owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, and Shawn Amaral, pled guilty to charges of failing to comply with asbestos disposal regulations (two counts) and were sentenced to serve two years of probation and to pay fines. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
’” See Herrscher v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
US, No. 08-30041 Involuntary dismissal with prejudice of convicted money-launderer's federal habeas petition is affirmed where Appellant is a repeat filer of facially deficient habeas petitions. . [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
Spoons, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 30, 2008 US v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Liddell, No. 07-1337 In a prosecution for being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of a motion to suppress a post-arrest statement made without the warnings required by Miranda is affirmed where the arresting officers' in-custody questioning fell within the public safety exception to Miranda established in New York v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Nichols, No. 06-5862 "The search-incident-to-arrest authority permits an officer to search a glove box, whether open or closed, locked or unlocked. [read post]
