Search for: "WEINSTEIN v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1 - 20
of 269
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
In any event, Egilman was probably not committed to the violent overthrow of the United States government because he had found a better way to destabilize our society by allying himself with the lawsuit industry. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
That's why cases like South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
It is our solemn duty to diligently guard these rights regardless of the crime charged, the reputation of the accused, or the pressure to convict (see Boyd v United States, 116 US 616, 635 [1886] [“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon”]). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
” This exclusionary criterion ensures lack of viewpoint diversity, and makes the Collegium an effective proxy for the law industry in the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:53 pm
(citing, Martin v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:30 am
Since 2000, Congress in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Bandera Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven J. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Bandera Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven J. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:57 pm
He remains wanted by the United States criminal justice system. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:59 am
In Amada (Singapore) PTE v. [read post]
