Search for: "Wai v. Parks" Results 1 - 20 of 4,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
It seems to me … that where proposals are not only capable of being reversed but must be (by virtue of a condition) undone after a certain period of time, then that is a way in which harm may be restricted”. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And in cert denial news, we are sad that the Supreme Court will not take up Pollreis v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
” in chalk on sidewalks and school buildings as the marchers made their way across the Westwood campus. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
The Court found that the Home Office had acted unlawfully in a number of ways, finding multiple breaches throughout the 3-part assessment of human rights law: that any interference with the Claimants’ Article 8 rights were (1) in accordance with the law, (2) necessary in a democratic society in pursuance of a legitimate aim, and (3) proportionate to that legitimate aim. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
After many years of litigation between the same parties, judges tend to find ways to narrow litigation, not expand it. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there will be an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 Reserved judgements Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini… [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
The adult film actress quoted the then-real estate mogul coaxing her into having sex with him if she ever wanted to “get out of the trailer park. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm by Michael Douglas
  Roder Zelt-Und Hallenkonstruktionen GmbH v Rosedown Park Pty Ltd – Australia’s first ever case applying the CISG – confirmed this by explaining that the CISG is ‘part of’ Australian law and is thus ‘not to be treated as a foreign law which requires proof as a fact’. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The regulator stated that it has “grounds to suspect the platform did not implement its age verification measures in such a way as to sufficiently protect under-18s from pornographic material. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am by Eric Goldman
Instead, the Supreme Court gave us only the barest-bones outline of a legal test that answers virtually no question that matters, so the lower courts will reach heterogeneous results and the issue will inevitably make its way back to the Supreme Court again. [read post]