Search for: "Waits v. Mississippi"
Results 1 - 20
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
She drove 13 hours roundtrip to Jackson, Mississippi in order to get abortion care. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
V. [read post]
SCOTUS Repeated Relisting of a Case on the Meaning of Race Neutrality--and a Plug for my new Article
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Thompson, 403 U.S. 217 (1971), in which the Court infamously allowed Jackson, Mississippi to close all of its public swimming pools in the face of a desegregation order. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
New York Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
So one might think, but in the 2015 case of Glossip v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
Appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1981, she would go on to write 645 opinions, including landmark decisions upholding gender equality (1982’s Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
Supreme Court took up a case from Mississippi called Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
” But because the question is before the Sentencing Commission now, he stressed, the court should wait before granting review. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
Mississippi (1898) (acknowledging that purpose, but expressing "no concern" regarding the Conventioneers' objective); Ratliff v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
Department of Justice “precleared” Mississippi’s provision to permit it to enter effect. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
But wait a minute? [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Fagan v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Then in City of Austin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
The First, Fourth, and Seventh Circuits have concluded that a website is a place of public accommodation.[7] The Third, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits have held that a website is a place of public accommodation, but only if it has a close nexus to a physical place of business.[8] District courts in the Second Circuit have provided contradicting rulings.[9] The Eleventh Circuit recently ruled that a website is not a place of public accommodation, but then later vacated its decision due to a mootness issue… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
ColbDuring the Mississippi abortion case argued earlier this term, the attorney defending the prohibition invoked the case of Washington v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:55 am
The Importance of Roe Roe v. [read post]
