Search for: "Wales v. Howard"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2023, 10:59 pm
The Associate Justice referred (at [33]) to Boele v Norsemeter Holding AS [2002] NSWCA 363, [28], where Giles JA of the New South Wales Court of Appeal held as follows: ‘In determining whether due notice has been given regard will be had to the notice provisions of the foreign court: for example, notification not by personal service but in accordance with the rules of the foreign court may be held to be consistent with affording natural justice even if not in accord with… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
Racially and religiously aggravated offences According to a Press Association analysis of Home Office data, racially and religiously aggravated offences recorded by police have risen by 15 per cent in a year in England and Wales. 76,884 racially and religiously aggravated offences were recorded in 2021, up from 66,742 in 2020. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am
[With thanks to Howard Friedman.] [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:39 am
One of his judgments which garnered media attention and criticism from the (then) Home Secretary – Michael Howard- was the case of R v Home Secretary ex p Norney [1995] QBD 6 Oct. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm
Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418, 429 (Dawson and McHugh JJ), 445 (Toohey, Gaudron and Gummow JJ). [8] Ibid, quoted in RCD Holdings (n 1) [57]. [9] Ibid, [58]. [10] Ibid. [11] See, eg, British Aerospace plc v Dee Howard Co [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 368; Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corp (2004) 138 FCR 496, 506; Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 419. [12]… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
On the same day Elisabeth Laing J heard a preliminary issue trial in the case of Warnes v Forge. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am
In the England & Wales High Court's Unwired Planet v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm
The Court of Appeal in England & Wales has handed down its judgment in the matter of Howard Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland [2019] EWCA Civ 648, on appeal from the decision of Sir David Eady, sitting as a judge of the High Court on the Queen’s Bench Division Media and Communications List. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:57 am
Howard Friedman (Religion Clause) for the pointer. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:13 am
In Elzahed v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm
In Howard Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland [2017] EWHC 3368 (QB), the High Court considered two complex issues: one relating to the doctrine of forum non conveniens and the other to the CPR provisions on service of a claim form. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:40 am
Thanks to Howard Bashman (How Appealing) for the pointer. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:06 am
In particular the Court (applying Associated Newspapers Ltd v HRH Prince of Wales [2002] Ch.57) impressed the importance of establishing not just that there is a public interest in publication; but also that there is a public interest in breaching the confidence which attaches to the information. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
On 7 July 2017, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Longmore and Sharp LJ) handed down judgment in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters [2017] EWCA Civ 950. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
On 28 June 2017, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Longmore and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP v Reuters Ltd. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm
In Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP v Reuters Limited and others, [2017] EWHC 644 (QB) Popplewell J granted an application for an interim non-disclosure order preventing the publication or use by a news agency of information contained in documents supplied by Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP (“BHAM”) to 36 potential professional investors. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:14 am
Reuters had also argued that publication of the information would be in the public interest – but it was clear from Associated Newspapers Limited v HRH Prince of Wales ([2002] Ch. 57) that it was not enough simply to it establish that there was a public interest in publication – there also had to be a public interest in breaching the confidence which attached to it. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
Howard Platnick likely misrepresented the views of specialists so it was easier for an insurance company to deny a victim benefits after the accident. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:31 pm
In the case of Polias v Ryall & Ors, the New South Wales Supreme Court awarded a poker player AUS$340,000 when he sued four of his former friends for defamation following comments posted on Facebook about a trip to Las Vegas. [read post]
