Search for: "Wallace v. Smith, et al." Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The article was accompanied with intimate photographs taken from Ms Wallace’s private Instagram account. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Sherwin, Wallace Stevens Professor of Law, Director of the Visual Persuasion Project, New York Law School --  Law in the Shadow of Violence: The Riddle and the Paradox of Sovereignty   W. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:58 am by Jon Sands
Smith w/Wallace & Korman). [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:01 am by Administrator
Wallace et al, 2014 ONSC 7449 (36315) When can third party records be subpoenaed. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Carter Wallace (pregnancy test) Deposition1998-12-22 Ethicon, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Hence, a death-row inmate must argue in this Court that Tennard, Smith, et al. announced new law, but, once he arrives in federal court, he must argue that those same cases simply reiterated clearly established law. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]