Search for: "Walsh v. R" Results 1 - 20 of 531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Not according to a recent decision from the California Appellate Courts, Crane v R. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm by bndmorris
Beyer’s memorandum was cited in the following article: Vincent R. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
 Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:06 am by admin
Jordan Walsh By Jordan Walsh In 2022, there were some impactful, but relatively quiet developments in federal employment law. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]