Search for: "Way v. Lucas*"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
” A few edited snippets from that exclusive interview follow:“V: What has helped forge your authenticity? [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 5:00 pm
In all honesty, when I bring a character to life I am not thinking about the audience, I lift her from the page in a way that is authentic for me … [and that] translates best to the person staring at the screen. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
The main cases here are Cofemel — Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
The main cases here are Cofemel — Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:20 pm
This is an emotional rainbow brought to life as something new and exciting – the way of the future ….. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:46 am
US may apply unclean hands: Villa v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:39 am
Consider, for example, Lucasfilm’s 2014 opposition against Empire Brewing Company’s “Empire Strikes Bock” beer (TTAB Opposition No. 91218848), and its 2016 suit against “Lightsaber Academy,” a business offering classes and certifications in the way of the Jedi, including martial arts, lightsaber swordplay, and stage combat. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am
On 14 September, Thawley J refused that application: Australian Information Commissioner v Facebook Inc (No 2) [2020] FCA 1307. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:40 am
However, there was no clear guidance in Hensher (their Lordships canvassed about nine different ways of defining a work of artistic craftsmanship before concluding that they furniture in suit was none of them) and a New Zealand case, Bonz Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 216 (Tipping J) had been approved a couple of times by English courts (Vermaat and Lucasfilm) so it offered a better way forward: and importantly it provided a route to holding… [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
Lady Hale particularly enjoyed the different ways in which counsel tried to influence the court's view. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:26 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question that the Italian Supreme Court had to address in Ralph v Mediaset and Others, decision 14635/2018 [Katpat to Valentina Borgese for the heads up and the text of the decision]. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 9:52 pm
Prod., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm
It seems that in every creative industry where money has flowed, IP protection has found a way to adapt in order to provide some security to those revenue streams. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:17 am
Although 1709 Blog readers did not agree with this proposition, in his judgment in SAS v WPL, Arnold J [at para 27] held that: "In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:48 am
Instead, [Appellant] argued that the Citation was defective and, therefore, prejudiced him in some way. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 8:20 pm
The court ruled in Commissioner v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am
Occasionally there are cases that seem to be tailor-made for legal geeks: Naruto v Slater; Lucasfilm v Ainsworth; DC Comics v Towle. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 11:56 am
Bank v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
In Shelley Films Ltd v Rex Features Ltd [1994], a film set was found to meet this criterion. [read post]
