Search for: "Wells Turner, III"
Results 1 - 20
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2024, 10:20 pm
The name “Orange Crush Festival” is trademarked by George Ransom Turner III. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 9:35 am
The First Amendment arguments in this case, Turner v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
As Jennifer Turner pointed out during the first panel, China gave itself a 20-year head start, despite holding only a tiny share of the world’s lithium reserves within its borders. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
At bottom, ruling in favor of Big Tech in NetChoice would effectively require the Supreme Court to disregard decades of First Amendment precedent and throw asunder legions of well-established antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 1:25 pm
Turner, 2023 Ga. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:00 am
By all accounts, he is an unusually decent man as well as dedicated jurist, but one can also believe that his narrow conception of duty has not, overall, served the country well. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
III. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 8:48 am
TURNER & COMPANY, L.L.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Pix Credit here The jurisprudence of the Religion Clauses in the United States has long been plagued by the doctrine that distinguishes between governmental speech and private speech. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:54 pm
The Justice Department is seeking information about the creation of the PAC, as well as its fundraising and spending practices. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The memo says no potential instances of obstruction of justice by Trump that were cited by special counsel Robert Mueller III’s “would warrant a prosecution for obstruction of justice,” regardless of whether the person being investigated was a sitting president. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The United State Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, opining that New York law offered "conflicting guidance" on the issue, certified the following question to New York State's Court of Appeals: "Does the 'special duty' requirement — that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally — apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The United State Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, opining that New York law offered "conflicting guidance" on the issue, certified the following question to New York State's Court of Appeals: "Does the 'special duty' requirement — that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally — apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal… [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Tyler is the Shannon Cecil Turner Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
"[115] So wrote Justice Breyer, and the cases he cited (PruneYard and Rumsfeld), as well as Turner, fully support that view. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
Roberts; Turner Broadcasting System v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 8:31 am
Sarah Deer, Professor, University of KansasKathleen Littleleaf, Billings Urban Indian Health & Wellness CenterSession Moderators: Robin Turner (ILS Section Member) & Lillian AlvernazSession Overview: This panel will discuss the impacts of over-policing and incarceration of Native American people and how Tribal justice systems can work to holistically support individuals involved in the criminal justice system. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:49 am
(I'll have my own paper in the journal as well, which will touch on many of these issues; my own views on this are uncertain and tentative as well, but I think some of the arguments that are cited favorably by the opinion are much worth discussing, whatever bottom line one ultimately reaches. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been followed in federal courts,[3] as well as in state courts.[4] Given that most of the side-switching cases are quite fact sensitive, it is instructive to detail the facts that lead to an expert witness’s disqualification in this frequently cited case. [read post]
